Lightroom 3 Beta Comparison Review

A review of Lightroom 3 Beta. A comparison between the highly acclaimed Lightroom 2.6 and the new incarnation of this award winning RAW processor. With new features and functionality, as well as some comprehensive updates, will Lightroom 3 entice new users into the Adobe arena, or is it simply stretching the monopoly with unnecessary features?

Lightroom 3 Beta 2 Review

If you are unaware, Adobe are offering a great opportunity to trial its latest versions of the acclaimed Lightroom software. Version 3 is now available for a free download so now has never been a better time to get your hands on this landmark piece of software.

Although still in a Beta testing stage, the result already seems to have a few extras that will inspire current users of the older version 2.6, as well as perhaps entice users of other RAW software into ‘the Lightroom’, where image adjustment has never been so simple, creative or intuitive.

The new Lightroom 3Beta import window. A new visual way of adding new images to the Library.

Develop panel now has a swap around and a new Effects Panel

In Comparison
As an avid user of Lightroom, it is nice to see some fundamental changes as well as some subtler more inclusions to image alteration and workflow. Underneath the bonnet there are also modifications and streamlining to the efficiency and speed of the image conversion process, buts lets have a look at a range of obvious and positive improvements –

• Image Import - Firstly there is a huge update to the Image Import method. Beforehand, a folder was simply selected from list of folders in your RAW image archive. Now the there is a far more intuitive system that uses thumbnails.
• This allows individual selection of images instead of importing an entire folder. Although not necessarily applicable to my workflow, when choosing content, this graphical way of delivery is certainly welcomed.
• Develop Panel – Everything looks very familiar here, but there are a few extras and a minor shuffle around. There is now a new Effects Panel and now the Vignettes Panel has gone.
• The Effects Panel contains the creative Post Crop Vignetting and also includes a new Grain Effect, useful for those moody black and whites in particular.
• A new Lens Correction panel is populated with Chromatic Arberration tools that were in the Details Panel, as well as another vignetting tools.
• Exporting – Exporting an image looks literally the same, although it now includes a Watermarking feature that may or may not appeal to some users. Graphics or text with variable opacity can be applied to an image as it is converted, but for those who like to alter images in Photoshop, this feature is also extremely handy when converting TIF to JPEGs for website upload, right at the end of the workflow. Just import your folder of archive TIFS, export the entire folder as JPEG, resize, sharpen and watermark. The arduous task is thankfully now automated.

New Published Services panel in the Library view. A flickering cash injection?

Hmm...
Other new features leave me head scratching. It seems like Lightroom is perhaps trying to envelop the user with a somewhat excessive monopoly. Features like the Watermaking and also the new Published Services (allowing direct upload of RAW conversions to Flickr straight from Lightroom) leave me a little perplexed.

I am left wondering whether they are trying to persuade the photographer to do away with their TIFF image archival process altogether. It is fair to say that with the myriad of image adjustments available in Lightroom, an image is workable to high standard in this software alone. Is the future a marketing split from the happy marriage with Photoshop to a stand alone software experience?

Perhaps Adobe are pushing these product features towards an in-camera / minimal post processing client base, like sports shooters and press photographers, or perhaps the casual photographer more interested in social networks. For visually creative users, who only see RAW software as a springboard to the neverending artistic possibility within Photoshop, these functions will perhaps remain bypassed, unless returning to apply these features to their TIFFs after post processing.

Interface and Engine
None the less, Lightroom 3 seats you confidently at the controls of a slick program. With beautiful expanding menus, smooth fades and great attention to visual detail, it’s certainly a joy to use.

My 8gig / Vista 64 system responded very well to it and although Adobe ensure there is a faster, more efficient new engine under the bonnet, converting 16bit TIFFs felt no faster that v2.6. With the same set of pictures open in v2.6 and v3 Beta, there was a saving of around 500mb of RAM with v3Beta, which is certainly nice to see. Lightroom has always been processor hungry so any attempt to reduce this value will be gratefully accepted.

It’s difficult to say whether any differences will exist between the RAW engines of v2.6 and v3Beta. If you are a Capture One user for instance, you will know that many prefer the Phase One RAW engine over the Adobe equivalent. For me, the myriad of controls Lightroom embraces far outweighs this difference.

Final Thoughts
Although Beta testing is a good way to get to grips with software, bear in mind that it is best to leave your serious processing to an updated and supported commercial release. I for one will wait with anticipation, as there is simply nothing on the market that gives photographers this much creative control over their images, from any other software house.

Related Links
Download Lightroom LR3Beta - http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom3/
Features and functionality videos - http://www.photoshopuser.com/lightroom3

Set as favorite

Bookmark

Email this

Hits: 1176

Trackback(0)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Catalogue

Have they made any changes to the catalogue functions? The one thing i hate about lighroom is when it cannot locate a file because you have deleted it or moved it but it still pulls through the thumbnail?

Steven Gourlay , 30, Mar, 2010 | url

• 
• +0
• 
• 

...

I think the whole way the system works leaves the same problem no matter what the version. With large image catalogues, the benefits of having cached thumbnails and previews far outway the annoyance. If you move files around, it's not the most intuitive of systems. You can always delete and import the images from their second location. When you have masses of images like I do, in a solid archival structure, the system works very well. Capture One and other RAW software either leave folders of thumbnails all over the place, or cache on the fly, making the whole system grind. I know which I prefer.

David Clapp , 30, Mar, 2010

• 
• +1
• 
• 

Write comment

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

Subscribe via email (registered users only)

Write the displayed characters

Add Comment Preview